Fine, die on that hill. I suppose you’re the sort of person that thinks a hunch is as good as objective reporting. Maybe the news isn’t your thing at all.
Edit: Look at it this way. Presumably, if this is “not news” because it’s so obvious, then in your view, it WOULD be news if it DIDN’T go up by 10%. Well that’s what this fucking article is about, okay? It’s about how it didn’t not go up 10%. It’s about how you can stop waiting to be surprised by it not going up 10%. JFC.
It’s the difference between knowing, and not knowing. You “knew” it would go up exactly 10% (somehow), but you didn’t actually know until you had reporting to that effect. But you’re all like, “No, don’t tell me, I would rather live in a state of eternal suspense.”
Fine, die on that hill. I suppose you’re the sort of person that thinks a hunch is as good as objective reporting. Maybe the news isn’t your thing at all.
Edit: Look at it this way. Presumably, if this is “not news” because it’s so obvious, then in your view, it WOULD be news if it DIDN’T go up by 10%. Well that’s what this fucking article is about, okay? It’s about how it didn’t not go up 10%. It’s about how you can stop waiting to be surprised by it not going up 10%. JFC.
…what does a “hunch” have to do with anything? Or objective reporting? I haven’t accused anyone of not being objective.
It’s the difference between knowing, and not knowing. You “knew” it would go up exactly 10% (somehow), but you didn’t actually know until you had reporting to that effect. But you’re all like, “No, don’t tell me, I would rather live in a state of eternal suspense.”