• starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    “Landlords deserve tons of money for no effort because they take on the risks of homeownership”

    Landlords when that risk manifests:

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      13 days ago

      Not that it stops this guy from being a pos idiot, but he did say “any amount”. Your critique would fit if he were complaining about local FD “not doing their job” or something.

      • Infynis@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        13 days ago

        The point of the post is that he claimed he doesn’t pay taxes for services that, if they were more robust, could have prevented this desperate, hilarious tweet.

        • Ech@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          13 days ago

          He (incorrectly) thinks he can buy his way out of it when it matters. And I have no sympathy for him, fwiw. If it was just his house burning, I’d bring popcorn.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 days ago

      Which is hilarious before we even get to that step. Real estate is one thing where, to make money, you don’t need to be intelligent or a risk taker or even have a lot of up front capital. You mostly need to have flexible ethics and the rest will work out.

  • stevedice@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    13 days ago

    will pay any amount

    No, he won’t. He will promise any amount and pay half of that to a lawyer to weasel out with some bullshit legalese.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      13 days ago

      Obviously in true ancap fashion, he’ll need to put the agreed payment in multisig escrow up front. Only an outlaw would refuse!

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    13 days ago

    Any amount, you say?

    Even more than what it would cost in taxes?

    • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      13 days ago

      That is one of the ways Marcus Crassus got rich in Rome.

      The first ever Roman fire brigade was created by Crassus. Fires were almost a daily occurrence in Rome, and Crassus took advantage of the fact that Rome had no fire department, by creating his own brigade—500 men strong—which rushed to burning buildings at the first cry of alarm. Upon arriving at the scene, however, the firefighters did nothing while Crassus offered to buy the burning building from the distressed property owner, at a miserable price. If the owner agreed to sell the property, his men would put out the fire; if the owner refused, then they would simply let the structure burn to the ground. After buying many properties this way, he rebuilt them, and often leased the properties to their original owners or new tenants.>

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_Licinius_Crassus

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 days ago

        So get at least a little money but lose the property, or let the property burn down out of spite so nobody gets it. You’d still own the land it’s on, right? Decisions, decisions…

        • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 days ago

          I guess it depends on if you have enough resources to rebuild or not. I don’t think insurance existed back then.

          The first option is bad but at least some of your stuff is saved. It depends on if anything was irreplaceable, but then you got to pay this ass clown rent.

          The second one is when no one wins, but if you have resources then just rebuild. If you have nothing then sell a plot of land for cheap, but still have nothing from the fire.

          • samus12345@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            13 days ago

            Yeah, saving your stuff from the building is a pretty big motivator since he’s only buying the property, not everything in it. I’m sure he got a lot of takers.

    • taladar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      I suppose oil well firefighters like Red Adair and similar specialized companies could be counted as private firefighters.

    • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Private emergency services are always a thing, which is why defunding emergency services is always a bad idea -yes, even cops - because the people in charge can usually pay for their own. They don’t GAF when you’re no longer safe, because they can be.

  • mothar@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    13 days ago

    Kinda ironic that the dude is called Wassermann which literally translates to waterman in german.

  • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    13 days ago

    This is how Crassus got rich. When a house burned, he’d show up with his firefighters, and then buy the house for an insultingly low price, because, well, the house was on fire. Then his firefighters would put the fire out.

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.worksM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    13 days ago

    Lessons learned

    We hired a property management company, but eventually took it in-house. “That was a really big mistake,” Wasserman recounts. “ My wife and I were going up on weekends to rent units. We don’t really speak Spanish so we often relied on Google Translate to speak with potential tenants. We quickly realized that we weren’t the right people to manage those properties so we eventually sold those assets, too.”

    Bakersfield taught them some important lessons:

    https://web.archive.org/web/20250109184023/https://www.geltventurepartners.com/article/bakersfield-to-billions-gelts-keith-wasserman-gets-results

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    You see, the trick to not having leopards eat your face is in fact to intentionally starve them, and then brag about it publically!

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Just wait until it is about a total war economy, and that their kids and grandkids have to go fight drones.

    It will be too scary to repost at, for sure.