• Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Not stupid. Our brain can just get tripped up sometimes and read what it expects to read instead of what’s really there. The sad part is that there are educated people in the US even today that would be surprised or even argue against you if you stated the other version (more atoms in a glass than in our galaxy). Our science education is woefully lacking now.

      What blew me away that I learned not too long ago is the notion that if the galaxy was the size of the US, our solar system would be the size of a fingerprint. Try to even visualize that. (reference is the Epic Spaceman YT channel)

    • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      The glass of water is a bit misleading. Your brain starts thinking about all the water molecules inside. That’s all.

  • psud@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s 2 > 1, so correct two hydrogens versus one star: Sol

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 months ago

    There are more memes estimating the size of the universe than there are stars in the galaxy.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 months ago
    • Number of hydrogen atoms in a single molecule of water (H2O): 2
    • Number of stars in our (ENTIRE) solar system: 1

    That’s the joke.

    • Etterra@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Thanks, I never would have been able to understand 2>1 if you hadn’t written up that amazing power point slide.

  • don@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    There are fewer hydrogen atoms in a single molecule of water than there are fingers on my hand.

    Check and mate.

  • NaevaTheRat [she/her]@vegantheoryclub.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Also interesting: If you were to take your nerves out and lay them end on end you would die.

    Actually interesting fact

    Your height is closer in scale to a light second than the size of an atom. And yet atoms seem more approachable than light seconds. Fascinating stuff!

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    I have as many assholes as stars in our solar system, even though it seems like more to Lemmy.

  • mspencer712@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I couldn’t find the clip, but first thing that came to mind was the StarTalk Live with Buzz Aldrin and John Hodgman.

    Hodgman: “maybe they’ll find H 2 2 2 2 O!”

    Edit: crap, I have to call myself out. I failed to read completely, thought the screenshotted poster accidentally changed one part of the comparison, instead of deliberately changing both parts. If the original was molecules in a cubic inch of water vs stars in the observable universe, I read this post as atoms in a molecule vs stars in the observable universe.

    Apologies, I discovered I was a fool and was excited to share my discovery.