This explains the White Box Testing which we use to test the internal structure or internal coding of an application or a programming component.
You must log in or register to comment.
It covers each and every line of the source code, each and every conditional statement in the program and every loop otherwise known as iteration in the program.
I think it is important to note 100% code coverage (“covers each and every line”) does not mean the tests are good tests.
Most of the time 100% code coverage is just a waste of time.
Worst, 100% coverage leaves you without a tool that is helpful for finding places where your tests might be lacking. Code coverage reports can be used to improve tests, but are not an indication of good tests in of itself.
Yep… I can get you 100% code coverage of a bug-laden, exploit-ridden piece of software effortless. It’s a useless measure.
This is a poor article. It makes no sense. It does not describe what white box testing really is.
It is different from the black box testing as the white box testing is not used to find missing functionality of a software
Like what the hell is that even meant to mean?
None of the advantages or disadvantages make any sense or related to whitebox testing at all. It is just words that are related to testing throwing around in hopes they mean something. Do not bother reading, it is not worth the effort to click on that link.
This is surely AI generated, but even so it’s still awful and a decade or more behind the curve of what I’d expect from AI blog spam!
