• BossDj@lemm.ee
    3·
    46 minutes ago

    Our annual evaluation is a scale of 1 to 4 for a variety of categories. We’re supposed to show growth on the scales each year.

    For 15 years, I’ve started each year at 3 and grown to a 4 so the boss can tell their boss that they’re helping us grow. I could just start at a 4, but I wouldhave to provide justification for each 4 and that’s not a good use of my time. Which I guess I could use to justify getting a 4 on time management.

  • The Assman@sh.itjust.works
    72·
    5 hours ago

    I always say never work too hard. Managers don’t know how long things take because they don’t do any actual work. Set expectations accordingly.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      13·
      3 hours ago

      It’s a pretty damn sad thing having to do it if you’re a fair and honest person, but that’s just how the world works.

      (There are a few managers out there whom you can be honest towards without them taking away your reward for being efficient of going the extra mile, but in my personal experience those are pretty rare).

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        5·
        2 hours ago

        I’ve pretty consistently seen the 1st level of management able to understand when you worked hard, and that it is not repeatable. Those problems tend to appear only when they report up what is happening.

        What is to say that often (not always), you can be honest with your manager if both of you can keep a secret.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          2·
          1 hour ago

          Well, sorta.

          Plenty (maybe even most) of 1st level manages will see and understand, but are still unable or unwilling to push back on unrealistic expectations coming from outside (sometimes not even from above, just from customer) so from the point of view of those working under them the result is the same if they’re not doing their own internal time reporting averaging and and are honest towards them.

          Further, they often fuck-up things, from planning to analysis and taking in account the dependencies on external providers and it’s the team that has to make up for it. Absolutelly, the managers will notice people going the extra mile … and do the same thing again next time around and it will be just as “unexpected” and “we have not other option” as all the previous times.

          I would even go as far as saying that the “understanding” manager that fucks you up anyway (sometimes because they’ll always put themselves above those working for them and might even be fake, others because they’re not very good at playing the game that needs to be played to other stakeholders) is the most common of all.

          Looking back (to almost 30 years of experience in several countries), some of my worst managers were “really nice” people but the team still suffered massivelly because they were not in fact good managers (they suffered alongside the team, for all the good that did to the rest) - essentially the team was holding the career of somebody who should probably be doing something else and at the end of the day, the managers rather than the rest were the ones getting more pay and bigger bonuses.

      • Flocklesscrow@lemm.eeEnglish
        6·
        3 hours ago

        Not just members, advocates of the line. Their compensation is a function of the surplus value workers create.

  • Hannes@feddit.org
    33·
    5 hours ago

    That’s why you always give 80% at work - so when shit hits the fan you can do 120%, impressing everyone while keeping a chill level of tasks for day to day stuff

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.caEnglish
      7·
      4 hours ago

      Which shows management that they can throw anything at you … so they start throwing everything at you.

      • thevoidzero@lemmy.world
        21·
        4 hours ago

        Then you start saying you can’t complete things, ask them which one is the priority. And actually not do everything.

        • IninewCrow@lemmy.caEnglish
          9·
          3 hours ago

          I learned a long time ago to do your job and do it competently … if you are in good work environment, you’ll be rewarded for your efforts … if you are in a bad environment, you’ll be taken advantage of … if you are in a terrible environment, you’ll literally be abused emotionally/financially/physically

          If you end up in good environment, then keep doing what you are doing

          If you end up in a bad environment, keep doing your job but start looking for an exit strategy and look for other options to eventually leave the current place you are working.

          If you are in a terrible environment … leave immediately even if it means you lose everything (don’t worry about it because if you had stayed, you would have lost everything anyway)

          • thevoidzero@lemmy.world
            2·
            1 hour ago

            If you have chances of reward then yes. But current situation seems to be really bad. They don’t really value the workers as much as they used to. And you can’t easily leave your current job even when it’s bad. Having most of the population in debt (car+home+college) has removed most of the freedom of the workforce from choosing to work somewhere else.

            Because in my opinion only when you can chose to not work and stay at home for a few months to look for other jobs, that you have a freedom of choice. Otherwise you have to just jump into whatever job you can find because you can get faster.

            • IninewCrow@lemmy.caEnglish
              1·
              1 hour ago

              I’m middle aged now and I never lived in or near a big city … always lived in small towns close to wilderness areas where I am most comfortable. I worked mostly as a labourer all my life … seldom for a company and mostly in all that time for myself mainly. … and I also have to admit during a time period where work and money was more available and within ones reach. Work was more plentiful and housing was more affordable.

              It meant I had freedom of movement and freedom of time … but it never meant freedom with money. I live within my means and I live very low key and I also don’t have children so I only support myself and my wife. So we live in a modest house I bought for little and fix myself and own cars and trucks that are all used.

              I can’t imagine what it would be like to live in or near a city in this day in age … I would probably not survive and just end up being one of those guys that know how to build a shelter in a dumpster and find food scraps from warehouses and restaurants.

      • Hannes@feddit.orgEnglish
        3·
        4 hours ago

        A good Management knows that they can’t demand 150% regularly though since that will wear workers out

  • Dr_Box@lemmy.world
    11·
    6 hours ago

    My work has been experimenting with a project for about 2 years now and this has been my life since then