And I’m being serious. I feel like there might be an argument there, I just don’t understand it. Can someone please “steelman” that argument for me?

  • Nadru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The arguments are as stupid as you guessed.

    These are naive emotional people who are dumb as fuck. I know so many in my life and it’s like arguying with a brick wall.

    Children still believe we live in a black and white world, democrats are in power now, genocide is happening, they will not vote for them. The concept that both will finance the genocide but another will be much worse is not something they can understand.

    You have others that want to intentionally punish democrats for not doing anything. Great in the meantime, Trump will provide a full carte blanche to Nettanyahu in the middle east, he will continue what he’s doing, annex everything without any limits. They were partying in Israel after Trump won.

    A third group wants the system to break down because they think if you’re a post collapse society, they will be able to build their utopia.

    Yes as dumb idiots living in la la land.

      • asret@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 minutes ago

        Then work to change it. Your voting system is broken and makes millions feel disenfranchised. People should be able to vote their conscience without worrying about stupid political games.

        I’ve criticized then for their voting behavior as well - that if they want outcomes aligned to their values that dictates a particular voting strategy.

        But you don’t get to blame them for the outcome. That’s on the broken system, and the failure of the losing party to appeal to them.