Hey there!

I’m thinking about starting a blog about privacy guides, security, self-hosting, and other shenanigans, just for my own pleasure. I have my own server running Unraid and have been looking at self-hosting Ghost as the blog platform. However, I am wondering how “safe” it is to use one’s own homelab for this. If you have any experience regarding this topic, I would gladly appreciate some tips.

I understand that it’s relatively cheap to get a VPS, and that is always an option, but it is always more fun to self-host on one’s own bare metal! :)

  • dan@upvote.auEnglish
    272·
    3 hours ago

    A VPS still counts as self-hosting :)

    I host my sites on a VPS. Better internet connection and uptime, and you can get pretty good VPSes for less than $40/year.

    The approach I’d take these days is to use a static site generator like Eleventy, Hugo, etc. These generate static HTML files. You can then store those files on literally any host. You can stick them on a VPS and serve them with any web server. You could upload them to a static file hosting service like BunnyCDN storage, Github Pages, Netlify, Cloudflare Pages, etc. Even Amazon S3 and Cloudfront if you want to pay more for the same thing. Note that Github Pages is extremely feature-poor so I’d usually recommend one of the others.

    • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      3 hours ago

      This is a bit fuzzy. You seem to recommend a VPS but then suggest a bunch of page-hosting platforms.

      If someone is using a static site generator, then they’re already running a web server, even if it’s on localhost. The friction of moving the webserver to the VPS is basically zero, and that way they’re not worsening the web’s corporate centralization problem.

      I host my sites on a VPS. Better internet connection and uptime, and you can get pretty good VPSes for less than $40/year.

      I preferred this advice.

      • dan@upvote.auEnglish
        2·
        3 hours ago

        You seem to recommend a VPS but then suggest a bunch of page-hosting platforms.

        Other comments were talking about pros and cons of self-hosting, so I tried to give advice for both approaches. I probably could have been clearer about thay in my comment though. I edited the comment a bit to try and clarify.

        I have some static sites that I just rsync to my VPS and serve using Nginx. That’s definitely a good option.

        If you want to make it faster by using a CDN and don’t want it to be too hard to set up, you’re going to have to use a CDN service.

        Self-hosted CDN is doable, but way more effort. Anycast approach is to get your own IPv4 and IPv6 range, and get VPSes in multiple countries through a provider that allows BGP sessions (Vultr and HostHatch support this for example). Then you can have one IP that goes to the server that’s closest to the viewer. Easier approach is to use Geo DNS where your DNS server returns a different IP depending on the visitor’s location. You can self-host that using something like PowerDNS.

        • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          2 hours ago

          I have some static sites that I just rsync to my VPS and serve using Nginx. That’s definitely a good option.

          Agree. And hard to get security wrong cos no database.

          If you want to make it faster by using a CDN and don’t want it to be too hard to set up, you’re going to have to use a CDN service.

          Yes but this can just be a drop-in frontend for the VPS. Point the domain to Cloudflare and tell only Cloudflare where to find the site. This provides IP privacy and also TLS without having to deal with LetsEncrypt. It’s not ideal because… Cloudflare… but at least you’re using standard web tools. To ditch Cloudflare you just unplug them at the domain and you still have a website.

          Perhaps its irrational but I’m bothered by how many people seem to think that Github Pages is the only way to host a static website. I know that’s not your case.