Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez recently made headlines for calling perennial Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein “predatory” and “not serious.” AOC is right.

Giving voters more choices is a good thing for democracy. But third-party politics isn’t performance art. It’s hard work — which Stein is not doing. As AOC observed: “[When] all you do is show up once every four years to speak to people who are justifiably pissed off, but you’re just showing up once every four years to do that, you’re not serious.”

To be clear: AOC was not critiquing third parties as a whole, or the idea that we need more choices in our democracy. In fact, AOC specifically cited the Working Families Party as an example of an effective third party. The organization I lead, MoveOn, supports their 365-day-a-year efforts to build power for a pro-voter, multi-party system. And I understand third parties’ power to activate voters hungry for alternatives: I myself volunteered for Ralph Nader in 2000, and that experience helped shape my lifelong commitment to people-first politics.


Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

    • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I will take responsibility for enabling one of the two genocide enablers that I can choose from, yes. I am choosing to enable the one that contains a modicum of dissention from the status quo vs the one that wants to wipe Gaza from the map entirely.

      Why would you want to enable the party that wants even more genocide than the Democrats do?

        • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          You’re still ignoring the realities of FPTP voting. There is precisely one way to effectively “vote against” the GOP during the general election and you seem to be advocating against it.

          Explain to me how Gaza gets better if Trump wins. Or literally any issue. Even if the loss magically created a huge shift in the Democratic leadership that echoed throughout the caucus and they go all in on every progressive policy we could possibly want. Let’s say they make Rashida Tlaib minority leader. Let’s say every single Democrat now supports a full embargo of Israel until they cease all hostilities. Lets say every Democrat now supports whatever policy you want. How does any of that help once the government is fully controlled by fascists that will literally make it impossible for the now Super Progressive Democratic Party to ever get back in power and do those things?

          If your justification for supporting the GOP is that the Democrats haven’t done enough on Gaza that’s fine. I just question the logic.

            • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              It’s a pretty simple concept and the only response is usually “not uh!”

              Just so everyone else is aware, we’re now here.

                • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Calling me out would suggest you’ve provided some evidence that I’m lying, despite just having my reasoning clearly laid out. Reasoning that you’ve provided no alternative to outside of “you’re lying”.

                  So where’s this call out? Explain to us how there aren’t 2 possible winners of the election in our FPTP system.

                  Spoiler

                  We’re going back to “Not Uh!”

                  • PeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    11
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Calling me out would suggest you’ve provided some evidence that I’m lying

                    i am the authority on who i am supporting, and my word is the only evidence you have. you are lying about who i support. and now you’re gaslighting me about needing to provide evidence.