All the posts about Reddit blocking everyone except Google and Brave got me thinking: What if SearNGX was federated? I.E. when data is retrieved via a providers API, that data is then federated to all other instances.

It would spread the API load out amongst instances, removing the API bottlenecks that come from search providers.

It would allow for more anonymous search, since users could cycle between instances and get the same results.

Geographic bias would be a thing of the past.

Other than ActivityPub overhead and storage, which could be reduced by federating text-only content, I fail to see any downside.

Thoughts?

  • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    basically requires a minimum of 20-30GB of RAM to be performant.

    That’s odd, the project page states 256 Megabytes and practically speaking that’s nothing. Where did you find 20-30G? Are you sure you’re not confusing the memory requirement with the suggested free hard drive space?

    Even if it does need 32G of RAM to perform well it’s not a very high hurdle. 32G of DDR4 can be had used for less than $75. Toss that in an old Core8/9 I5 Desktop, install your preferred flavor of Linux, add Docker, and you’re off to the races.

    • seang96A
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Like I said documentation is out of date, reading their forums you see quite a few posts about it. The yacy grid sounds perfect for me since it runs a bunch of microservices and I have a cluster of mini PCs. Only problem is the yacy grid is unfortunately lacks the distributed P2P part.