• John_McMurray@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    45
    ·
    7 months ago

    Could I have made it more obvious what I was talking about than by stating those years and using the words “trials” instead of “charges”? like did you really think I was talking about those? JFC.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 months ago

      The article is talking specifically about the Jan 6 stuff, which he is facing a criminal trial over. In fact, when Mitch McConnell voted to acquit Trump in the impeachment for that, he directly stated that it was because it was more suitable for a criminal trial.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      You made no indication what you were talking about and you’re “surprised” that people think you were talking about the article.

      Ladies and gentlemen, the intelligence and honesty of trump supporters on full display right here.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          The problem is not my ability to read, but your inability to think outside of yourself. You’ll continue to pretend it was clear because, again, you are so wrapped up in your own head that you can’t even step outside of yourself and see a different perspective.

          Which, again, is probably why you aren’t smart enough to avoid defending trump here.