Wisconsin’s powerful Republican Assembly leader said Tuesday that he hopes the liberal-controlled state Supreme Court adopts new constitutional legislative boundary maps, even as he slammed proposals from Democrats as “a political gerrymander” and threatened an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The court tossed Republican-drawn maps, long considered among the country’s most favorable to the GOP, and ordered new maps that do not favor one party over another. It said if the Legislature doesn’t adopt maps, the court will.

Assembly Speaker Robin Vos said Republicans have approached Democrats about passing new maps in the Legislature, but “we have not gotten a warm reception to that idea.”

  • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    10 months ago

    Easy enough, let’s make political gerrymandering unconstitutional, as it always should have been. Politicians should not be choosing their voters, that’s 180° backwards.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        You can have an independent commission drawing the maps, and people have even developed algorithms that can do it in software so there’s no human involved.

      • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Computer programs exist that can draw legitimate districts. Lawsuits can challenge districts, and if found to be based on race or political affiliation they can be removed. Bad faith actors will forever be a problem though.

  • SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    10 months ago

    Vos dismissed the maps submitted by Democrats, saying they would move too many boundary lines and force incumbent lawmakers to run against one another.

    How dare you undo my gerrymandering!

  • Zorque@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    10 months ago

    “we have not gotten a warm reception to that idea.”

    Well… yeah, because of gerrymandering you outnumber them nearly two to one, despite receiving roughly the same amount of votes. If it were put to a legislative vote you’d make it even more unbalanced.

  • Billiam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    10 months ago

    Political gerrymandering is Constitutional. Your party’s corrupted SCOTUS out front should have told you.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin’s powerful Republican Assembly leader said Tuesday that he hopes the liberal-controlled state Supreme Court adopts new constitutional legislative boundary maps, even as he slammed proposals from Democrats as “a political gerrymander” and threatened an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

    Assembly Speaker Robin Vos said Republicans have approached Democrats about passing new maps in the Legislature, but “we have not gotten a warm reception to that idea.”

    “We are always open to conversations with our colleagues, but have yet to be convinced that Republican Legislators are serious about passing a fair and representative map, especially given the extreme gerrymander they submitted to the court on Friday,” she said in a statement.

    Vos dismissed the maps submitted by Democrats, saying they would move too many boundary lines and force incumbent lawmakers to run against one another.

    In the 2022 election, Wisconsin’s Assembly districts had the nation’s second-largest Republican tilt behind only West Virginia, according to an Associated Press statistical analysis that was designed to detect potential gerrymandering.

    Vos has also suggested that the appeal would argue that liberal Justice Janet Protasiewicz, who called the current maps “rigged” and “unfair” during her run for office, should not have heard the case.


    The original article contains 665 words, the summary contains 204 words. Saved 69%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      They also don’t need to do the favor of just repeating the Republican’s chosen framing rather than using the headline to outline the actual truth.