Our battery completely changes that equation. Whether it’s hooked up to a 120V or 240V connection, our battery charges gradually while you’re not using it. Then, when you’re ready to cook, it can quickly release the power it’s stored up to achieve astoundingly high performance. We’re talking 72,000 BTU/h. Compare that to 18,000 for the best gas stoves.

  • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I have a hard time conceptualizing using a stove that puts out 4 times the energy of the best gas stoves. It’s not like we need pans to get even hotter. I guess maybe that level of power would be only really used to heat up water to a boil? I guess it could be pretty hard on the cookware. I think it would be more efficient to have a insulated water boiler that just keeps water just below boiling all day long.

    I don’t think I’ve ever cooked on induction, though, so maybe I’m missing something. Either way, though, I’m glad this technology seems to be coming along

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yeah, it’s an instant-boil capability.

      If they made a wok version of the stove, it would allow something equivalent to commercial-kitchen stir-fries.

      The big deals for most people are:

      • the battery means you can run the stove off a 120v connection and avoid the expense of rewiring a kitchen built for gas
      • You get the ability to cook for a week or so during power outages
      • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Apparently the battery is only good for “three meals”. But the idea is not bad, just overpriced a lot.

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s down a lot from what was proposed earlier when they first announced

        • jadero@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s what I was thinking. My place isn’t wired for 240v. I was initially excited. Then I saw the price and converted to Canadian dollars. It’s been a while since I’ve priced it out, but I think it would be less expensive for me to put in 240v, get power to my shop, and buy a used electric stove. Obviously, I wouldn’t have induction, but that’s not something I actually care about.

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Not if the stove (and its battery) last for several decades. Even with the higher cost of this stove as compared with other induction stoves, it’s likely a cheaper choice for 10% to 20% of US households looking to get off gas.

  • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    Building the future of home electrification

    So, why a battery? It comes down to three main reasons:

    Improve performance Make installation easy Pave the way towards resilient, efficient, fully-electrified home

    All these points they make are bullshit.

  • Thevenin@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    A stove is probably the last thing I’d try to put batteries in, but being able to make wok hei stir-fry without a propane burner is going to be uniquely appealing to some people.