• joemo@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Hey I appreciate the quick answers! Woke up recently and didn’t feel like searching so thanks for doing the hard work for me.

    • Daniel F.@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m curious why that only prevents people who have sworn an oath. Why should anyone who has engaged in insurrection be able to hold office? Forgive me if this is a dumb question, I am only half awake.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        They didn’t want to completely disenfranchise southerners after the Civil War. There’s an argument to be made that they should have, but I can see their logic in not wanting to antagonize people while trying to put the country back together.

        At the time, people were a lot more loyal to their states than to the US as a whole, so it would have been a lot like punishing patriots for fighting for their country.