This post at the top of the community homepage explains and answers all of my issues.

  1. The idea of the Fediverse is that you can fed with and defed from any instances as an instance moderator, OR just block a particular instance on a personal level. Right?

If yes, then why is Threads fedding up being viewed as such a big issue? I am not saying I like it. I’m just wondering what the actual issue is and what the real threat is that they pose? I read some comments saying that if Threads feds up, then they could pull the numbers and this gain some sort of majority that would lead to a control over the Fediverse… But, isn’t the point of the Fediverse that people can just stay away from an instance if they don’t like it and still interact with the people?

  1. Also, our posts on any instance are public. So even if we defed from a particular instance, wouldn’t our posts still be accessible? I read that Threads can access our information. The publicly available information on the Fediverse is mostly just usernames and the posts we make. That’s available regardless of them wanting it, right?

I’m looking to understand the issue, not spark a fight. Please. Let’s talk it over and not start being asses.

Remember, a different opinion isn’t the end of the world.

    • ElPussyKangaroo@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Hmm… I hate that I have to ponder over ethics and morality to enjoy a fucking leisure scroll on a platform that I like. Fuck Google. Fuck Meta. Fuck Apple. Fuck these pieces of shit.

  • RmDebArc_5@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I think the issue people have is that threads is way bigger than all Mastodon instances and that they could having control over Mastodon because of the amount of content coming from threads vs the actual Mastodon instances

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      The only control they could exert over mastodon is the control mastodon etc give them.

      I don’t think for one moment that IBM Google or Apple are ever good even though they contribute code and funds to at least a few different projects. What I think those projects do well is their priorities and sticking to them. Ask Torvalds about bending the knee and stopping everything else to give Google or IBM a “nice to have” or breaking change that they want for themselves. They can make and submit their own patch. To be accepted or not. Torvalds will stick to the road map.

      As long as activity pub, mastodon, and Lemmy stick to theirs. There’s little to nothing to fear from meta or anyone else. Users can block their instance and their users as needed. They’re welcome to screech hatefully into the void. We are not beholding to them.

  • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I want nothing to do with companies and their bullshit. I don’t want to see their brainwashed users pushing more garbage my way. Anything that separates logic from impulse is a ok in my books.

    The internet was good until companies started to see benefit in it…now it’s mostly all garbage