1.8 Million Barrels of Oil a Day Avoided from Electric Vehicles::Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News! We love covering electric … [continued]

      • Sybil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        if there is no difference in the actual oil extraction and burning, then it does no good.

    • astropenguin5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      A little less yeah, considering that there has been an increase in renewables for grid power, also it’s much more efficient burn oil/natgas/etc. in a big powerplant than in an ICE car, so less is needed overall.

      So yes. It does help. But electric trains are still better lol And we need more renewable grid power

      • Sybil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        less is needed overall.

        So yes. It does help

        this is what i’m dubious about. just because less is burned in, say, passenger vehicles does not mean any less is produced or burned in some other industry. this article actually says that we made more oil this year than last.

        • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          But it does mean less was produced for and burned by the automotive industry

          All other things equal if those EVs were ICE then even more oil would have been used for what should be obvious reasons

          • Sybil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            unless it actually decreased GHG emissions, it did no good. it’s rearranging the deck chairs.

          • Sybil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            then even more oil would have been used

            if the oil is in the ground, it can’t have been used.

            • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Do you think we literally use oil as we dig it up with no buffer?

              Or that oil extraction amount isn’t being constantly adjusted based on demand by every entity in charge of it?

              Or that if more ICE vehicles were on the road more oil would be needed?

              These are all very basic concepts

              • Sybil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                i think there is no way to prove we would have dug up and burned any more oil than we did since we can’t prove a counterfactual. what we do know is, despite an increased use of electric vehicles, oil extraction increased.