Cornflake@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 17 hours agoThis one's for my minecraft rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up188arrow-down12
arrow-up186arrow-down1imageThis one's for my minecraft rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneCornflake@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 17 hours agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squareseang96AlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·15 hours agoI always thought of it as something like 2 dimensional beings wouldn’t see 3 dimensional or how we wouldn’t be able to see 4 dimensional beings.
minus-squareLudrol@szmer.infolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·14 hours ago4D golf has thought me otherwise. I even begun imagining simple 4d object in my mind.
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·13 hours agowe can’t truly 100% accurately conceptualize 4d shapes, but 3d shadows of 4d objects is piss easy and basically good enough
minus-squareLudrol@szmer.infolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-212 hours agoI think I can but I can’t really be sure that what we imagined is true. I can imagine 2+2=5 but it isn’t true. Also there is aphantasia and whole gradient of imagining capabilities. What if only a subset of humans can imagine 4d objects. My workflow: imagine a cube, imagine a second cube offset by 4D unit. connect the verticies.
I always thought of it as something like 2 dimensional beings wouldn’t see 3 dimensional or how we wouldn’t be able to see 4 dimensional beings.
4D golf has thought me otherwise. I even begun imagining simple 4d object in my mind.
we can’t truly 100% accurately conceptualize 4d shapes, but 3d shadows of 4d objects is piss easy and basically good enough
I think I can but I can’t really be sure that what we imagined is true. I can imagine 2+2=5 but it isn’t true.
Also there is aphantasia and whole gradient of imagining capabilities. What if only a subset of humans can imagine 4d objects.
My workflow: imagine a cube, imagine a second cube offset by 4D unit. connect the verticies.